Copyright © 2010 Mountain Bike Reviews. All Rights Reserved. Snowblind by Themes by bavotasan.com. Powered by WordPress.
Powered by Max Banner Ads
- Women’s Sugar Cycling Short made of signature Pearl Izumi Sensor fabric that provides stretch comfort and quickly wicks moisture away from the body for easy evaporation
- Women’s specific, seamless, four-way stretch 08′ 3D Tour Chamois with 13 millimeters of contoured padding and silver antimicrobial fibers that reduce bacteria and regulate temperature
- With a 5.5-inch inseam length, the Sugar Short is Pearl Izumi’s shortest cycling short
- Shorts feature 6-panel anatomic design to eliminate pressure points and are flatlock stitched for zero abrasion to skin
- Lifetime warranty against defects in materials and workmanship
Product Description
An ideal companion for spin class, the Sugar Short features a 5 ½ inseam, a 3D Tour Chamois and stylish, ultra-soft SELECT Sensor-Transfer fabric for a great fit. The 6-panel anatomic design delivers a comfortable fit make you look good on and off the bike. The SELECT Sensor-Transfer is buttery soft and performs with quick dry and wicking properties. Pearls Womens 3D Tour Chamois dampens road vibration with 2 layers of multi-density padding that is 13mm thick. T… More >>
Pearl Izumi Women’s Sugar Cycling Short
January 26, 2010 at 2:19 am
The Sugar short is billed as being a lower rise, short inseam bike short with leg grippers that will hold your shorts in place (which is standard on bike shorts.) I bought these shorts in a size xs; I weigh 115 lbs at 5′2.
1. They are not lower rise. They are the same rise as all other bike shorts- practically up to my boobs. “natural waist” or some other jazz. They come way up my back, overlap several of my rips, almost 4″ over the top of my butt if I don’t roll them down. I roll them down.
2. The legs are too big! They are loose! I was appalled after I ordered these to discover that they included all the discomfort of there being elastic on the leg cuffs with none of the “staying in place” that it is supposed to accomplish. They ride up to an unfortunate degree. Not only is this uncomfortable, it is an extremely unflattering look.
3. The chamois is very nice, I would probably buy something else with this chamois if I could try it on first.
Basically, I would not recommend these shorts.
Rating: 2 / 5
January 26, 2010 at 2:41 am
These shorts are wonderful-I am so glad I bought them! They are great for long rides and have a lot of padding. I probably could have bought a large, but I really hate anything that is binding. They look great and are just the right legnth. I love them!
Rating: 5 / 5
January 26, 2010 at 4:06 am
These are great shorts, the padding is well done, preventing rubbing and chaffing. The length of these shorts on my legs is great, although I don’t think I’d classify them as ‘low rise.’ But the top band rolls down and they are comfortable. I use them for intermediate distance road biking, and have found these to be my favorite pair of cycling shorts. I’m 5′8″ 135lbs and wear a Medium.
Rating: 5 / 5
January 26, 2010 at 6:26 am
As a beginning rider, I have found these shorts to work very well in mountain biking and road cycling. The padding is great and makes riding a hard saddle not so bad. They are a great length and the elastic band is very confortable and effective at keeping the shorts from riding up. They are a lower rise than the majority of other PI bike shorts, coming about an inch above my hips. I wear a M (5′8″, 130lbs.) I definately recommend these shorts for beginning to intermediate any female rider.
Rating: 4 / 5